Apr 282011
 
Jason Cochran on the Shark Tank set

Cameraphone moment behind the Shark Tank chairs as Aldo Orta prepares to deliver his pitch for his jewelry line. Entrepreneurs are shown their marks but are not permitted to speak to the Sharks until the pitch begins.

Visiting TV sets is always a thrill. It’s not because I am a pure fan. I mean, I am not necessarily always pinching myself in disbelief over being there. Of course I knew Chandler and Joey’s apartment was an existing set when I toured the home of Friends at Warner Bros.

No, for me, the thrill is strangely historical. Just as I love going to Westminster Abbey, where kings and queens from the storybooks still lie, I get excited to be in a place that I previously knew only as an image or a symbol. It’s where received information clicks into reality.

That’s the way it was when I was on the Shark Tank set. It’s always a mind-twist to see how the shapes and distances and perspectives that you see on television are so different in the flesh. It’s odd to see how a room you thought was so familiar in fact does not feel the way you thought it would. First, of all, it has no ceiling other than the industrial soundstage ceiling, many feet above. It’s also a good reality check to see how a good TV set operates no different from a set in a community theatre production — it just takes a lot more money to design and build.

And more than anything, I love the heritage of the soundstages. Look up at Sony Pictures Studios, which used to be MGM, and staring back at you are wooden rafters that were silent witnesses to some of the world’s most recognized performances and faces. Even the dust is historic there, and unlikely to have been swept away. The soundstage in which the Shark Tank crew and cast ate lunch one day was the same one in which Flying Monkeys were filmed in The Wizard of Oz. “Singin’ in the Rain” was shot on Stage 27. Name a famous MGM movie, and those aged soundstages, so hollow most of the time, were where they happened, shot by shot.

They are the warehouses from which our American culture was shipped to us.

From a historic perspective, that’s a very intense thing to hold onto. Everything you see on camera has to happen somewhere, but when it comes to movies, we tend to accept that they’re in a spatial limbo. Yet cameras captured something that happened on that very spot, and afterward, every sign of the event was cleared away, leaving the soundstage as a shell. It’s the only thing left to witness those vital moments of American history.

Just being in that place, for me, makes The Wizard of Oz true. Not a story that happened, of course, but a thing that was cared about and created and hammered out, shot by shot and minute by minute, by working people who got hungry and sweat and yelled and got stuck in traffic on the way home. Movies become records of real events (of fabricated scenarios) that happened to be snatched in seconds-long increments. Being in a studio brings me out of the mindset of a consumer and irresistibly into connection with the people of the past.

Shark Tank‘s second season was shot on stage 22, and its “holding” room for entrepreneurs was built in Stage 8 (which means that when you see someone stewing ahead of their appearance, they’re not actually in the same stage; when the time comes, they have to run outside, across a lane, and into Stage 22.) My time roaming the soundstage was among my favorite during my season two shoots.

Apr 222011
 

"Mr. Wonderful" is appraising you for your dollar value

In between pitches for the second season of Shark Tank, I snatched a few minutes of time with Kevin O’Leary while the other Sharks were getting made up.

Kevin O’Leary is precise. He’s ruthless. He’s mercilessly to-the-point. And that’s just his sound bites! In the Shark Tank, he’s like that, too, but with the added focus on wresting control from any entrepreneur foolish enough to let go of it. If you’ve ever seen him in action, you know by his razor tongue that he’s no one to be trifled with. Money is his schtick, but it’s also his obsession. He didn’t become a billionaire merely from being quick with the quips.

In our chat, O’Leary gives his advice for making money when you don’t have the luxury of starting with any.

 

Apr 222011
 

During my recent trip into the Shark Tank, I reconnected with the informercial whiz Kevin Harrington, the resident of the first seat. Rather than pitching him a business, I asked him about what it’s like to get pitched, particularly in this recession.

He must have been pumped up for the day’s meal of entrepreneurs in crisis, because in this interview — which was terrifically hectic because they were re-setting in between business pitches, so bear with the noise the way we had to — he was surprisingly candid about where he’s making his money these days and what types products fill his wallet the most.

I should have asked him where he gets his tans. I want to live there, even if it means days spent golfing.

Here’s a shot with Kevin (and Barbara Corcoran and Robert Herjavec) from a satellite media tour I covered during the first season of Shark Tank.

 

A guppy among Sharks (Robert Herjavec, Barbara Corcoran, Kevin "Solid Tan!" Harrington)

Apr 222011
 

True story: Daymond John saw this and tweeted, "I tried to watch...but Kevin O'Leary's bald head was so damn shiny! I had to throw sand on the screen to kill the glare!" My head is cropped out, so it must be true.

After I interviewed Shark Tank Sharks Kevin O’Leary and Robert Herjavec (click here to watch that interview, which dates from my Traffic Cone Professor sartorial period), a debate emerged in the comments section. The two also appear on the older, Canadian version of ABC’s fish-themed angel investor show, Dragon’s Den, and the bickering began: Which show is better?

Judging by the comments, you’d think Dragon’s Den has the edge, but the numbers probably aren’t representative. After all, Canadians are more likely to be vocal about their preferences since American culture has a way of dominating North America. They’ve got to be louder than the Americans when a comparison is at stake or else they risk not being heard at all.

O’Leary and Herjavec think the crucial difference between the two shows has a lot to do with that imbalance. After all, they’re business, and they think in terms of market potential:

Apr 222011
 

Those with an inattention to detail might think that Barbara Corcoran and I are related, but there’s no mistaking the fact that I love her. Outrageous, conservative, tough as nails yet soft as pudding, simultaneously fearless and sensitive — she’s diverse and memorable. I’ve interviewed her several times before, including in her office and at a satellite media tour. I was even her fifth wheel/Ed McMahon in a miniseries of self-help video segments we did for a website I once worked for.

Here, we chat on the set of ABC’s Shark Tank in between pitches.

Fans of Barbara ( like me) can double up with this video of her, made on a different day of the Season Two shoots, describing her successful investments from the first season of Shark Tank.

Sigh.

Cochran and Corcoran
Apr 212011
 

Jeff Foxworthy and me: Hapeville-made

This season on Shark Tank, two new men join the lineup of Sharks: Mark Cuban and Jeff Foxworthy, both of whom rotate in Kevin Harrington’s chair when he’s not there.

I met Foxworthy, who hosts another of producer Mark Burnett’s shows, Are You Smarter than a 5th Grader?, at the dawn of his first day on his new job. I learned a couple of interesting things when I did my pre-shoot homework. One is that he lived in the same town that my grandparents did: Hapeville, Georgia. (I wonder if he used to go to the Richway, like I did.) The other is that 25 years ago, his job was to maintain mainframe IBM computers.

As it happens, I realized, fellow Shark Robert Herjavec, who immigrated to Canada from Croatia as a kid, got his beginnings selling IBM mainframe computers during the same period. It’s hard to get a scoop in the over-covered entertainment universe, but I was pretty proud of finding that one. You can see Robert Herjavec learning about it for the first time on yesterday’s video interview with him.

By the time I met Foxworthy, the next day, Herjavec had already filled him in on their shared origins in the make-up room. Took my scoop and used it to make a fast buddy! If they go in on a business together during the second season of Shark Tank, I’d like to think I brokered the friendship between them that allowed it all to happen. Hey, Robert — it’s on camera.

Some people may wonder what a stand-up comic such as Foxworthy is doing on a panel of self-made titans, but that’s where they’re wrong. As I pointed out when the casting was first announced, Foxworthy has created a multi-milliondollar merchandise franchise out of his personal brand.

He’s certainly canny, and a dark horse among Sharks, but does he have the teeth to hang with his flesh-eating colleagues? You be the judge:

Apr 202011
 

I caught up with Robert Herjavec, one of the Sharks from ABC’s increasingly popular show Shark Tank, as he was preparing to step onto set in the early morning at the start of the day’s shooting. When the glint of something caught my eye, he handed an assistant his cup of coffee to show off: a pair of solid gold, shark-shaped cuff links with diamond eyes that were made by a British jeweler. Robert wasn’t telling precisely how much the paid for them, but the number he threw out was around $15,000 in U.S. money. “What is that? Is that like a couple minutes’ [work]?” he joked.

Yesterday, I posted my interview with his rival Shark, Daymond John, whose “doorknob” diamond earrings may have out-Sharked Robert’s bespoke jewelry for sheer blingitude. There’s a story about how John got those, too, but he wouldn’t tell it on camera.

And then there was their boss, Mark Burnett. His outfit — white button-down shirt, rolled-up sleeves — was defiantly unassuming. As one of the most powerful people in TV, he had nothing to prove. We all knew who had the most power on that set.



Robert Herjavec and me

Apr 192011
 
Daymond John

The first time I met Daymond John, I had the temerity to think I could dress as well as he does

Daymond John is one seriously smart man. He likes to pretend he isn’t, but that’s one of the things that makes him so clever — he takes you by surprise when he swoops in. When I was on the set of Shark Tank‘s second season, I had a chat with him. (I first sat down with him at the very start of Shark Tank‘s first season). He reveals what he keeps by his chair at all times during the shoots and just what he’s writing on his pad when the entrepreneurs are delivering their pitches.

He is also one of the sharpest dressers I’ve ever met. Check out those earrings!

You can watch full episodes of Shark Tank on its site at ABC.com.

Apr 182011
 

Me with the great Mark Burnett

I had the rare opportunity to attend the shoot of the second season of ABC’s Shark Tank. I created “AfterShark” for the first season of the show, and for that, I interviewed the business owners after they had appeared on the show, so for the second season, I was invited to come to the set itself for the taping and do live interviews. Among the many people I was lucky enough to meet: all of the Sharks and the entrepreneurs who were slated to pitch their businesses to them on those days. Over the next few days, I’ll be posting some videos that came out of that fantastic experience.

I’ll start with the king. This is Mark Burnett. Burnett, if you don’t know, is the most powerful force in reality TV in the world. His shows include Survivor and The Apprentice, and of course, Shark Tank. We sat down in the Sharks’ chairs (he sat in Kevin O’Leary’s, I was in Daymond John’s) and talked about the show, the recession, and whether he would ever consider joining the Sharks himself one day.

Apr 152011
 

For every show, a slavering reaction

Something is very wrong on Broadway: There’s a standing ovation for every performance.

Last year, I went to see the new musicalThe Addams Family at the Lunt-Fontanne Theatre. A day later, the New York Timesproclaimed it “genuinely ghastly” and a “collapsing tomb.” Reuters said its “artistic inspiration pretty much ended with the pitch meeting.” The Washington Post deadpanned that it was “this year’s answer to the question How many talented people does it take to screw up a concept?”

It was torpedoed by pretty much everyone. Yet just a few hours before, the audience I was part of rose to its feet. What’s going on here?

Simple: devaluation of praise.

Two decades ago, standing ovations were awarded mostly on merit. Only the upper echelon of performances earned them. Almost all performances, even superior ones, were congratulated by a hearty, but seated, round of applause. That modulated sign of respect was enough to please even a veteran performer, and if an actor was fortunate enough to see a crowd driven to its feet, a career could be instantly made.

Now, though, audiences rise as if compelled by the same machinery that makes the curtains fall. All it takes is a few people in the front rows to get it going. Once that eager vanguard — many of whom are diehards who won those seats in discount ticket lotteries — pops up, the people behind them must do it, too, in order to maintain their view of the movie star they paid top dollar to see. Most modern standing ovations are carried out without gusto and without cheering. Just clapping and standing.

“It’s an ‘occasion’ now – whatever the hot ticket is for the middle-aged and rich,” legendary Broadway composer and lyricist Stephen Sondheim is quoted as saying about our audience ovations. “They want to remind themselves that it’s an occasion. They’re applauding themselves.”

The price of modern entertainment

A single orchestra ticket to The Addams Family on a Saturday night will cost you $178.16, including fees, if it’s bought using Broadway.com. “Premium” tickets, which don’t come with foot rubs, cost $360.60. Usurious rates like that are what promoted the Wall Street Journalin its own Addamspan, to say, “tickets are so expensive that you can buy an iPad for less than the price of four orchestra seats.” It was being charitable: new iPads start at $499.

With prices like that, no one wants to be the first to admit the show stinks. Many audiences give perfunctory standing ovations out of pure, stubborn unwillingness to admit they just blew a wad of cash. These reluctant standees usually make up the majority of the ovation. They’re not leaping to their feet because they’re overcome with uncontainable jubilation and praise. No, they take their time to put their Playbills down first.

“The pro forma Broadway standing ovation now springs from duty not desire,” wrote Brendan Lemon in the Financial Times in 2003.

Sondheim observed another aspect of the worthless standing O: “Every show now gets a standing ovation, but I think if you’re really moved, you don’t stand.”

He’s right. The standing ovation has become so inconsequential that now, the only true way to gauge a performance’s quality has inverted: A standing O won’t tell you anything, but if the audience resolutely refuses to get up, you know the show’s been terrible. Tell your actor friends that the musical you saw got a standing O, and they probably won’t be impressed, but talk about how an audience remained seated during the bows for John Stamos and Gina Gershon’s Bye Bye Birdie, and you’ll see them wince knowingly.

I think that long ago, bowing actors searched the house for people who were leaping to their feet. That sight was enough to set them abuzz with gratitude. Now, they probably zero in on the people who refuse to get up. If an actor notices a bunch of people who are only sedentarily pleased, it must really scotch a good mood. Was I that bad?

Standing ovations do still happen when there are stellar performances to reward. But rising is so common, no actor can be sure anymore. They must wonder: Did they really like me, or were they just standing like usual?

An interaction with celebrities

Audiences also tend to make a point of standing for stars, the way subjects respectfully rise for royalty. It’s hard to keep a Broadway show running nowadays without a plugging into star power, and the audiences are beginning to behave the way pilgrims do, by paying respects obviously. The hard-working ensemble may be applauded from the seat, but the star’s praise is from the feet.

For every truly gifted star performance, such as Scarlett Johansson in A View from the Bridge, there are six Quentin Tarantinos in Wait Until Dark, Katie Holmeses in All My Sons, or Nicole Kidmans in The Blue Room. All took forgettable or regrettable stage turns, and all routinely received standing ovations.

The presence of a star often signifies a higher production budget, too. To make it worth that big name’s time to dally on Broadway, producers often guarantee sizable weekly paychecks. That contributes to the high price of tickets.

Broadway producers increasingly feel comfortable mounting awful written-by-committee shows as long as they can lasso a big star to headline it — or base it on a movie the masses already know and trust, which is a form of star power.

I’m not saying that you should defiantly sit on your hands the next time the crowd around you rises from its seats. Giving a standing ovation is the new standard, and bucking the new standard will only make you look petulant. You’ll also usually find it impossible to see the bows if you’re the only one sitting down.

But the next time you’re reluctantly swept into rising for a performance that was just so-so, ask yourself why you feel compelled to do it. The social and financial pressure to join in means you’re probably putting on a little performance of your own.

They rose for that

Update: All right. I just saw Jerusalem and War Horse in one weekend. I freely admit I some performances are unquestionably worth standing ovations. I only wish more shows were like those.